WHAT ABOUT THE CAT?
Do you need
closure in the books you read and the movies you watch? Does it bug you when
you’ve invested a few hours in a movie but you don’t get a sense of closure and
leave the theater or turn off your TV feeling unsatisfied? Many TV series will
end the season with a cliffhanger that has you hungering for the new season to
start. I understand that. It’s much like ending a chapter of a book with a
hook. But what I’m talking about is a movie with a beginning, middle and end,
only there’s not so much of an ending.
How do you feel
when you read a book or story and there’s no real closure? I thought about this
recently when a friend told me about a serial story she read. There was no
ending, and you had to buy the next installment to see what happens. My friend
was upset and said she wouldn’t buy the next one because she wanted an ending
to the one she read. I agreed.
I want a satisfying
ending to the movies I watch and the stories I read. And I want the authors to
tie up all loose ends. A few years ago, I read a book by one of the top selling
mystery authors in the country. I’d never read any of his books, but since a
friend gave it to me, I felt obligated to read it. This one was written in
collaboration with someone else. It was okay, not great. There were three
different mysteries intertwined. In two of the mysteries, the crime was solved
and we found out who the villain was. The third story was left hanging, as if
the authors forgot about that thread. It was just dropped. We never learned
“whodunit.” I wanted to throw the book across the room. I’d read through the
whole thing and I didn’t get closure.
A while back I
read a book by one of my favorite authors (I don’t want to name names here). He
writes suspense. This book was great with an intriguing premise: that Hitler
won WW2. However, much as I love this author and as much as I enjoyed that
book, the ending left me hanging. Did the protagonist die to sacrifice himself
for the greater good? The author never said. I suspect he left it open on
purpose so the readers could come to their own conclusion. That bothered me. I wanted
to know in no uncertain terms what happened to the hero.
On a related
topic, a playwright whose name escapes me, famously said something like this:
If you have a gun in the first scene, you’d better use it by the last scene. If
you put a character, an animal, an item of importance in the story, you’d
better let us know what happens to that character, animal, item. Don’t insert
someone or something, give it importance, then forget all about it.
Case in point:
years ago I read a romantic suspense by one of my favorite romance authors.
This book was very good. The heroine had a cat who figured prominently throughout
the story. At the end, the villain set fire to the heroine’s house. The heroine
escaped, and the ending showed her getting medical attention, the hero by her
side, and the bad guy in custody. But no mention was made of her cat who was in
the house with her. I kept wondering, “What about the cat?” Did it die in the
fire? Did it escape? I read and reread the last chapter trying to find the cat,
but nothing. It would have taken just one line to let us know. Something like,
“Fluffy had escaped too, and was her usual playful self.” This was in the days
before the Internet. If I read it now, I’d find a way to contact that author
and ask her about the cat. Some may think I’m a crazy cat lady, and maybe I am,
but the heroine’s cat was woven all through the story and given importance. And
then it was dropped.
A top-selling
crime author who lives in my area writes a weekly column for a local paper.
Recently, she gave a very moving tribute to her elderly neighbor who’d died.
She’d talked about him and his cat in other columns. In her tribute, she never
mentioned the cat. I contacted her through her website and asked what happened
to the neighbor’s cat. She wrote a very nice reply saying she’d taken the cat
and it was living with her and her menagerie of pets. Then, a few weeks later,
she wrote in her column that she’d had so many people write her to ask about
the cat and she wanted to assure all of us the cat was fine and living with
her. So, I’m not the only one who asks, “What about the cat?” We readers want
closure.
I just finished
a terrific book by another favorite author. The book was great, and I couldn’t
put it down. It’s been awhile since I’ve read a book that captured my interest
the way this one did. In the book, the heroine has a cat whom she loves very
much. When the heroine is in jeopardy, the hero wants to take her to his hotel
to protect her. But she doesn’t want to leave her cat. He tells her a cat can
stay alone overnight. True. Then, the story goes on and the heroine is living
at the hotel for at least two days and nothing is said about the cat. Again, I’m
thinking, “What about the cat? Doesn’t she have to feed it and clean the litter
box?” Finally, the hero says he’s taking her back to her place to feed the cat.
And the heroine goes something like this, “OMG. I forgot about my cat.” I love this
author, but I think she messed up a little here. If that heroine loved her cat
as much as the author made us think, she wouldn’t have forgotten about it. I
wonder if her editor realized nothing was said about the cat and inserted that.
At the end, when the hero and heroine are in Hawaii together, the heroine thinks about
the friend who’s watching her cat. At least in this book, I got closure. The
cat was okay.
Despite my
emphasis on cats, I do have a bigger point. Give the readers closure, a
satisfying ending, and if you put in a pet or a friend or an item and give it
importance, don’t drop it from the story. Readers like me take notice. You
don’t want your readers asking, “What about the cat? Or the dog? Or the
necklace? Or the friend?”
What do you
think? How do you feel about books and movies without proper endings? Have you
ever wondered after watching a movie or reading a book, “What about the (insert
name here)?” Can you tell us about them?
Danger and desire brew a volatile mix as two wounded souls fight
to stay alive and find love.
Anita Santisi is an
independent, successful businesswoman with a wounded heart. And some very bad
people after her. Break-ins, home invasions, and attempted abductions have
turned her comfortable life dangerous. Can she trust her mysterious, sexy new
neighbor, Luke Corrado, or is he behind the criminal acts?
Special Agent Luke Corrado
carries his guilt like a loaded Glock. A woman he loved was murdered because of
him. Now, on a new undercover assignment to protect Anita Santisi, he’s
determined to redeem himself. What he doesn’t expect is that Anita will tempt
him to let down the barriers around his heart.
As Anita and
Luke find themselves in ever-increasing danger, they must fight to stay alive.
Will they open their hearts to each other before it’s too
late?
14 comments:
lol what ABOUT that cat? I don't like to be left hanging either. A line somewhere about the cat washing the soot from his face would have been good. Cute post, Cara. :)
I like closure in stories. That said, some are so memorable (for example, the Millennium Trilogy by Larsson), I keep thinking about the characters and what they're doing after the book(s) end. :)
Thanks, Rose. I like your line about the cat washing soot from its face. I'm glad I'm not the only inquiring mind who wants to know what about the cat.
Thanks, Tina. I know what you mean. As much as I wanted closure on the WW2 suspense book, I kept thinking about the book and the characters long after I finished it because I didn't know what happened to the hero.
I love reading stories with animal, as long as they end good. Most of my books have a dog, cat or a horse in them. And they are always mentioned in the end. Good post.
Hi, Cara! You would think someone one (editor, friend, critique partner) would have read these stories and said something. I don't even think I would read a book about Hilter winning WW2. Ick.
Looks like someone spammed too.
Thanks, Judy, I have put cats in many of my short stories and books, but nothing bad ever happens to them. All my stories have happy endings.
Vicki, that WW2 story was excellent. It's not exactly what you might think. It's got suspense and conspiracy theories galore.
Hi Cara,
Great post! I do like closure when it comes to things like pets and friends that have figured predominantly in the story. We all know that cat owners do not forget their pets (nor do dog owners). I would never believe that.
Gotta have closure!!!! I absolutely hate it when you don't. I've had many animals in my books, but never forget them at the ending...
I believe you have to have tie up the loose ends and had closure. What did happen to the cat? Occasionally, I've been satisfied with an ambiguous ending (did they get together or not?) but not usually. I agree with Jean. Gotta have closure!!! I guess not all authors agree with that.
Thanks, Paris, Jean and Ann. We're all in agreement about closure, especially when it comes to living creatures like pets and animals. If I could remember the title of that one book where the author never mentioned what happened to the cat, I'd find the author's website and ask her.
I do need closure. Sometimes those small things can nag at me for days! I would want to know about the cat too, even if it did die in the fire.
Thanks, Melissa. I'm with you. Maybe we just have inquiring minds, but we need closure.
What about that Cat? I would have asked the question, too, Cara. I agree all questions should be answered pertaining to the main characters.
If you have secondary characters who will show up in another book (like a series) then it's okay to leave a question hanging.
Oh, yes, I like closure. Thanks to romance books, I am now fully addicted to the happily ever after or at the very least the happily for now ending.
Post a Comment