Romantic Suspense Author Kris Bock In Defense of “Too Stupid
to Live”
Readers complain about characters – almost always female –
who are TSTL: “too stupid to live.” Writers dread the accusation but also want
to tell an exciting story, and excitement doesn’t come from a character who
stays inside with the doors locked and calls the police at the slightest hint
of danger. But how do you define stupidity in character behavior? When is a bit
of carelessness, inattention, or reckless courage all right, and when is it
going to cause people to roll their eyes or throw the book across the room?
I think this is actually a much more complex question than
many people realize. A lot depends on personal history, personality, and even
region. In my small New Mexico town, I don’t hesitate to go walking or jogging
alone after dark. I have never once been harassed in this community. I’m not
saying it’s perfect, but I’d worry more about drunk drivers and aggressive dogs
on the loose than muggers or rapists. Yet I have lived in other communities
where it would be considered “stupid” for a woman to go out alone after dark.
(I’m not claiming I’ve never done it though.)
The issue has real-life relevance as well, in victim blaming
– the tendency to assume that a crime victim has some responsibility for being
foolish enough to get into a situation that led to the crime. That is usually untrue
and always unfair, but it can make others feel safer because they wouldn’t be
that foolish.
Heroic Stupidity
I also think it’s unfair that behavior which would be
considered heroic in a man would be considered stupid in a woman. A man who
hears a noise outside his house and goes out alone to investigate would often be
called brave for protecting his family. A woman who does the same thing is
called stupid.
Granted a man might
be stronger or a better fighter than a woman, but it’s not a given. For either
one, the behavior could be rational or stupid depending on whether they have a
legitimate reason to suppose that the noise is coming from a stray cat or from a
killer. In real life, many of us would assume the former, and we’d be
embarrassed to call the cops to chase away a stray cat. But in books we know to
suspect the worst, which means characters look stupider when they don’t expect horrible
things. (Personally, I’m more likely to roll my eyes at a CIA agent who misses
an obvious plot twist than an average person who doesn’t expect danger.)
In my romantic suspense Whispers in the Dark, my
heroine recently suffered from an attack. She is not by nature fearful, but
this has left her struggling to recognize when panic is legitimate and when it’s
something to control. A couple of readers accused her of the dreaded TSTL
behavior, though I’m not sure if they’re referring to the times when she
controls her panic and keeps going, or when it overcomes her and she flees. In
some cases, running away blindly is more dangerous.
Ironically, other readers have said that character rings
true, because, in essence “she thinks just like I do.” She’s not a kick-ass
action heroine. She’s an ordinary woman who finds herself in an unexpected
adventure. She has a hard time believing she’s really in danger, or figuring
out which direction it’s coming from.
How People Really
Behave
In my romantic mystery What We Found, the heroine is
walking in the woods with a man – someone she knew slightly in high school but
doesn’t know well now – when they stumble upon a dead body. She assumes they’ll
call the police, but he insists they don’t. He takes her phone away and
threatens to get her boss (his father) to fire her if she reports this. His
behavior throws her so much after the shock of finding a body that she doesn’t
know what to do. She delays doing anything, and then a few hours later fakes
finding the body for the first time on her own.
Many readers sympathized and even identified with this
character. But one reader (a man, perhaps not coincidentally) left a review
railing against her choices, because in his mind, if something like this
happened, you call the police. You just do, no question. (Curiously, he blamed
her, not the man who insisted she didn’t call.)
However, this book was actually inspired by a real experience where
friends and I found the body of a murder victim. Of course we reported it, but
someone high up in law enforcement mentioned that often people do not report
crimes like this. That got me wondering why … all the reasons people might
think it’s safer to ignore a crime than report it … and What We
Found came out of that. So
whether the character’s behavior was “stupid,” it was not unrealistic – it was
more real than that one reader wanted to believe.
In real life, are we always smart? How many times have you
regretted a choice? How many times do you see your friends making the same
stupid choices over and over, even though you, as an outsider, are convinced
they should do something different? Is it fair to have higher standards for
fictional characters? Perhaps it is, if we expect books to be better than real
life. Besides, experienced readers can see things coming in books in a way they
can’t in real life, so authors have to work harder to surprise readers. But it
seems that not everyone agrees on what behavior is TSTL.
Chances are most of us do “stupid” things frequently and get
away with it. Fortunately, we don’t always get what we deserve!
Kris Bock writes novels of suspense and romance involving
outdoor adventures and Southwestern landscapes. In Counterfeits, stolen Rembrandt paintings bring danger to a small
New Mexico town. Whispers in the Dark
features archaeology and intrigue among ancient Southwest ruins. What We Found is a mystery with strong
romantic elements about a young woman who finds a murder victim in the woods. The Mad Monk’s Treasure follows the hunt
for a long-lost treasure in the New Mexico desert. In The Dead Man’s Treasure, estranged relatives compete to reach a
buried treasure by following a series of complex clues. Read excerpts at www.krisbock.com or visit her Amazon page. Sign up for Kris Bock newsletter for
announcements of new books, sales, and more.
I love stories where the characters think like I do. I would have of course been afraid to call the police if the man I was with, took my phone away. He started sounding like someone who might have a reason to know about a dead body!
ReplyDeleteI agree with you. I'd rather have a character act "real" than with false, or even stupid heroics. I want to read about characters who would do as I would. I've read suspense stories where the heroine takes foolish chances that almost get her or someone else killed. Maybe the authors were trying to portray the heroines as "kick-ass," but to me, the heroines were foolish. I love the Southwest. I'll have to check out your books.
ReplyDeleteThanks for your comments. It's nice to know I might be making sense!
ReplyDeleteIf you want to check out some titles, The Mad Monk’s Treasure ebook is 99 cents at Amazon and FREE at Nook, ARE, Smashwords, Kobo and Apple/iTunes. (I'm hoping Amazon will price match eventually.)
Whispers in the Dark is free through Kindle Unlimited until 2/21. Then I'm planning to add it back at the other retailers.
Thanks, Kris.
ReplyDeleteI'd be worried about a guy who didn't want to call the police, unless he gave me a darned good reason why. Sometimes and in some areas police can be notoriously incompetent, but in case of murder I don't see much choice.
ReplyDeleteOh, she was worried!
ReplyDelete